An international list (https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2024?&page=6&tab=indicators®ion=North%20America&countries=us&sort_by=rank&order_by=asc) has us at 480, but when you limit the region to the United States, we are ranked by them above some notable schools like RPI and Stevens Institute of Technology. In that list, Webb Institute does not appear at all. I guess that means we rank above Webb in that international ranking. Here is what they point out about their methodolgy:
“The 20th edition of the QS World University Rankings features 1,500 institutions across 104 locations and is the only ranking of its kind to emphasise employability and sustainability.
This year, we’ve implemented our largest-ever methodological enhancement, introducing three new metrics: Sustainability, Employment Outcomes and International Research Network.
The results draw on the analysis of 17.5m academic papers and the expert opinions of over 240,000 academic faculty and employers. Massachusetts Institute of Technology celebrates twelve years at the top, the University of Cambridge retains 2nd place while the University of Oxford (3rd) climbs one position. ”
That first paragraph shows that academics is a major part of the criteria, unlike the “SmartAsset” methodology, which apparently ignores academics entirely.
]]>